Critical writing can mean many different things depending on who is writing and what he or she wants to show with this writing. Nevertheless, there is one term that suits critical writing the best. Critical writing is a process of evaluating important issues and occurrences which have been or are taking place in any aspect of social life and placing these evaluations and thoughts in a popular and persuasive manner in a paper.

Critical writing makes a person evolve psychologically because thanks to it, he or she begins to question things around him/herself as well as use critical thinking skills. In this case, one can say that critical writing embraces many genres and academic writing is a part of it. Academic writing is narrower and focuses on certain topics, but it requires the same abilities and approaches as critical writing to which it belongs to.

Once one has read various definitions of elite academic essays experts about critical writing he/she can say that although they use different formulations, the definitions proposed mean the same things. For example, Bell Hooks views critical writing as a consequence or logical reaction to a certain discussion or a debate taking place, and it emerges as the sight of culmination or a location for prolonged engagement, an invitation to work in a sustained manner with ideas. In this case, critical writing is the author’s answer to something which has a meaning for society; but it is also a personal answer and explanation.

This definition is similar to the one presented by Brodkey because it describes critical writing as something that has to bring person joy, and also let him or her express his or her originality or uniqueness through the words. To her mind, critical writing is impossible without the author’s unique self, which can be seen when she writes: “…For finding and following a bias is as critical to writing as it is to sewing”; and this idea intersects with bell hooks’ words as well.

Critical writing is something that cannot be taught as long as a person does not want to learn it and is willing to take risks. Nevertheless, after one has succeeded in that, the author may try him/herself in various genres. In this case, it is essential to analyze the genres issue when it comes to critical writing. When speaking about genres, it is important to think of Bawarshi as he explains them as something that exists thanks to the writers who are creating them, but they do it because genres are already there. In some way, it is a closed circle. Looking at genres from this perspective and applying them to critical writing, one can say that critical writing embraces many genres, but it is still one huge starting point where writers begin and create something in various genres and directions.

Hence, I agree that the genre itself is not as important as what the writer is willing to do with it. I also agree with my fellow student who states that all of the genres intersect with each other a lot because new genres are inspired by the old ones. It is true because literature as everything else in this world does not exist in a vacuum; thus, every single work can inspire another one, and so on. I also agree with my peer about the fact that the actual beginning – not only in writing, but in everything – has already been inspired by something or somebody else, so it is not really a beginning, but rather a continuation of something greater than that.

One can say that critical writing provokes many thoughts and ideas. It is a constant process of thinking, evaluating, writing, and thinking again. Critical writing can combine various techniques, approaches and genres, but it always affects every single individual in a very special and unique way.